Talk:Dodge Charger Daytona

Re 2006 Daytona, the classic looks is a matter of ones individual taste, and as for performance, in most categories the 2006 will leave the "classics" far behind, I think this should be changed as it seems to be someones opinion, not based on fact, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Girvanayrshire (talk • contribs)

Ah, thanks for bringing that up. I removed it as it wasn't NPOV. --ApolloBoy 06:36, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Year and color counts

From this FCA posting [1] information on colors, model, and model year volumes for the Daytonas and other high impact colors. — MrDolomite • Talk 15:51, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dodge Charger Daytona. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100804144952/http://blog.cardomain.com:80/2010/04/28/the-cardomain-obscure-muscle-car-parking-lot-1977-dodge-charger-daytona-1978-79-dodge-magnum-and-1979-chrysler-300/ to http://blog.cardomain.com/2010/04/28/the-cardomain-obscure-muscle-car-parking-lot-1977-dodge-charger-daytona-1978-79-dodge-magnum-and-1979-chrysler-300/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:28, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]